2. With the CWS's, no one in the project is paid to do research or code for LibreOffice. If someone at LO wants something done, then they will need to either do it themselves or persuade someone at Apache to do it for them. And btw, insulting the Apache project at every turn is not a recommended way to persuade someone to help you. And demanding that things be done immediately is also unlikely to elicit the kind of response you wish.
In any case, we asked for a list of which CWS's LO wants. We're waiting, patiently, for a response.
3. If you check our version control logs I think find that not a single commit has been made by the Symphony team in Beijing. So your assertion that the "vast majority of actual developer[s]...appear to be Chinese IBM staff" is false. But what if it were true? Do you have a problem with Chinese engineers or something?
4. As for your statement that "I have not seen evidence to that effect" that other Chinese companies are involved, this would only be true if you have not read the list in the last week, where we had a huge set of introductions by such developers. Perhaps you missed these *43 posts*:
5. As for promises of code not being the same as code, that is undeniably true. So I assume that in a couple of weeks when the code is actually contributed, you'll be gracious and give us credit for carrying out that promise?
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds