User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Toward a safer fput()

Toward a safer fput()

Posted Apr 27, 2012 8:09 UTC (Fri) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935)
In reply to: Toward a safer fput() by valyala
Parent article: Toward a safer fput()

It does, except that it doesn't wreak havoc on synchronization primitives (APCs can be queued on processes that are waiting on a semaphore or event; if that happens, and a concurrent wakeup happens, something else will be woken up with potential for starvation or even deadlocks). Search for PulseEvent on MSDN or Raymond Chen's blog.


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds