User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Distributions

DuckDuck Debian?

April 4, 2012

This article was contributed by Nathan Willis

The Debian project is considering a proposal from the DuckDuckGo search engine to accept a percentage of the engine's advertising revenue that originates from web browsers on Debian machines. The project already welcomes donations and has several other organizations that make large contributions, but DuckDuckGo's proposal would require some accounting that would dictate some small changes to the browser software — and that, in turn, raises thornier questions for the project's developers and package maintainers.

Proposals

Stefano Zacchiroli, the current Debian project Leader (DPL), wrote to the debian-project list on March 27, explaining that he had been approached about a possible revenue-sharing agreement with the DuckDuckGo search engine. Two alternatives were proposed.

In the first scenario, the company would donate 25% of its income from inbound traffic on Debian systems (provided that DuckDuckGo is available as a search engine option in a web browser). In the second scenario, the company would donate 50% of its inbound-traffic income from Debian machines if Debian set DuckDuckGo as the default search engine in the browser. In both cases, the company proposed counting Debian traffic by using a modified search URL:

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q={{search}}&t=debian

DuckDuckGo further requested that Debian send a periodic invoice to the company, presumably based on the traffic statistics that the search engine already publishes.

Zacchiroli commented that he had discussed the search URL proposal with Mike Hommey, maintainer of the Iceweasel package (Debian's re-branded version of Mozilla Firefox), who had no objections to the proposed string modification. Zacchiroli said that he was "very much inclined to accept" the proposal, and asked for input from the rest of the project. In particular, he pointed out that DuckDuckGo had a publicly-visible history of donating to open source projects, including other distributions. The main risk, he added, was that the project needed to make clear to the company that the agreement would not interfere with package maintainers' freedom to make their decisions on purely technical grounds. That said, he expressed his confidence that the risk was negligible, and that the maintainers could be trusted to "keep on doing their thing."

Zacchiroli also solicited input from the maintainers of other browsers, clarifying in a later message that DuckDuckGo had initially proposed appending the term "iceweasel" to the search string, to which he and Hommey had counter-proposed "debian" in order to include all of the packaged Web browsers in the arrangement.

The 50%

Several developers expressed concern that taking the "50% proposal" and changing the default search engine would upset standing relationships between Debian and the various browser projects, or between Debian and the displaced search engine. Some questioned whether Mozilla or Google may become unhappy with a change like this. Philip Hands asked whether replacing Google as the default search engine would endanger Google's sponsorship of DebConf or acceptance of Debian as a Google Summer of Code mentor. Steffen Möller said it would put Debian in "competition" with the upstream projects:

At the moment we are perceived as enthusiasts serving upstream developers with the best possible presentation of their work. Once we start getting money through their tools, they may possibly start thinking differently.

Clint Adams strongly disagreed with that sentiment, and said:

I reject and resent the idea that any software project has the entitlement to profit off of my web traffic.

Treating the change of a query string as theft is as ridiculous as broadcast TV stations telling me I'm robbing them by skipping commercials.

I was horrified to see this attitude espoused in the Ubuntu-Banshee episode.

Andreas Tille, on the other hand, asked whether Debian and Mozilla truly had a "good" relationship to begin with, given the renaming controversy of a few years ago. But ultimately Charles Plessy's viewpoint seemed to represent the views of most in the conversation, that the crux of the problem was in making a technical change from upstream's default for a non-technical reason.

Peter Samuelson suggested explicitly rejecting the 50% proposal outright, on the grounds that even the appearance of letting money influence a technical decision like the default search engine would be detrimental to the project. To that idea Zacchiroli replied that he had never intended to put the 50% option on the table, and meant only to open the floor to a discussion of the 25% proposal, even if that distinction had been unclear in his first message.

For his part, Iceweasel package maintainer Hommey commented that he would not even "start to consider [DuckDuckGo] as a default until it at least matches the user experience the current default engine provides, including search suggestions and localized results." So there would appear to be no possibility of Debian accepting the 50% proposal at this time.

Privacy and partnership

Although general opinion on the list leaned in favor of the 25% proposal endorsed by Zacchiroli, several people raised concerns. The first was that even the 25% arrangement established too close of a link between the search engine provider and the activities of package maintainers. Möller, in the same message where he speculated about competing with upstream projects, suggested that it would be more consistent and ultimately preferable to list DuckDuckGo as yet another partner that donates to Debian, and ask them to donate whatever amount they see fit. Paul Wise agreed, and said that Debian's time should either be spent building a flexible, user-configurable system for controlling revenue sharing deals, or not to touch them at all.

Zacchiroli replied that although he can see the potential risk in the DuckDuckGo partnership unconsciously affecting the project, he was "quite convinced" that it would not impact the project. If nothing else, he said, the chain between the entity donating the funds (DuckDuckGo) and the people making technical decisions (individual package maintainers) is long enough to mitigate the risk.

Joey Hess raised a privacy issue, noting that incorporating OS information into the User-Agent (or, presumably, the search string itself, which was DuckDuckGo's proposal) would amount to leaking information about the machine to a third party. Thijs Kinkhorst observed that there are already many ways for remote servers to know that a machine is running Debian, including User-Agent and plug-in information. The fact that Iceweasel identifies itself as such is enough, on its own, to identify the system as being a Debian derivative, for example.

Regardless of how detailed the tracking abilities of DuckDuckGo's proposal are, however, Zacchiroli argued that per Debian's governance model, the ultimate choice ought to be left up to each browser package maintainer:

All in all, as a project we should simply see the agreement as something like "for every web browser in Debian who decides to use t=something, Debian will receive donations". If, due to the usual way we maintain packages, including upstream relationships, that set will shrink to nothing, too bad. The agreement will simply allow the set to exist, it will not magically fill it with browsers that implement t=something.

Send in the lawyers

Neither the hands-off-donation suggestion nor the privacy question garnered sufficient support to overwhelm the general interest in accepting the DuckDuckGo 25% proposal. The devils are always in the details, though — or, as Jonas Smedegaard commented when Zacchiroli described the 25% as "basically it", there is no "basically it" when legalese is attached.

Smedegaard asked for more details on Debian's end of the agreement, as did others. Zacchiroli alluded to clauses that allowed Debian to challenge the numbers in DuckDuckGo's periodic statistical reports, and allowed either party to terminate the arrangement, but he declined to post the agreement itself on the list because neither side had agreed to make it public. He did make it accessible to Debian Developers, however.

Hess noted that there was also a clause requiring Debian to provide 30 days advance notice before "releasing changes to the implementation of the links." Axel Beckert asked if that meant advance notice of any modifications to the packages, but Zacchiroli expressed his interpretation that only changes to the search string were covered by the clause.

Still other questions about the specifics bubbled up at the end of March, and have yet to be definitively resolved. For example, Russ Allbery asked if the proposed agreement dealt with Debian's relationship to downstream projects:

Is DuckDuckGo aware of the fact that Debian is upstream of a number of derivative distributions that just import our packages, and if we modify our packages to do this, other distributions will be counted as "Debian" for their revenue-sharing purposes even if they aren't exactly?

For example, Ubuntu would inherit this behavior for the web browsers they just import from Debian, unless they went out of their way to change it.

Related, do they realize that we cannot and will not enforce any of the terms of their contract with us on any derivative distribution that happens to import Debian web browser packages?

Plessy asked whether the deal broke with Debian's long-standing policy against advertising. He cited a 2011 incident where the Debian Med project was removed from the Planet Debian feed for inviting users to shop online via an affiliate program that would direct funds back to Debian. Plessy said he did not see much difference between the two arrangements:

It is hard to guess where to draw the line between what is acceptable and what is unacceptable regarding revenue sharing agreements and their advertisement. I hope that the decision that will be taken about DuckDuckGo's proposition will be accompanied by a clarification on what we can generalise from it.

At this point, the general consensus appears to be in favor of accepting the 25% proposal, and leaving the decision about deploying the requisite search string change to the maintainer of each individual browser. With Hommey in favor of the change, and Iceweasel being the most well-known browser, Debian can probably expect to start seeing some revenue from DuckDuckGo.

Several project members asked whether there were projected revenue numbers attached to the proposal; Zacchiroli said that he had asked his contact at DuckDuckGo, but that no statistics were available. Consequently, what the deal means for the project is uncertain. "Considering we're talking about a non-default search option, I agree with Mike that the share of our searches will be quite low. But I've no idea how that would map to actual donations." Your author has no doubt, however, that the more slippery questions over adding trackable information to the search string and where to draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable revenue streams will crop up again — particularly if the search kickback ends up being substantial.

Comments (14 posted)

Brief items

Distribution quotes of the week

You might be on to something here! But the 140 char limit would really stifle my creativity when it comes to comments. I'd rather create facebook pages for every package - that way we could add karma by "liking" a package.

We could even take it a step farther and use this for marketing. Just imagine - "Play farmville with glibc next wednesday and learn about the great new features!", "gdb has shared a picture with you", "NetworkManager wants to be your friend". Oh the possibilities ...

-- Tim Flink (Thanks to James Wilkinson)

Oooh.The next [Fedora] name must be Chartreuse Bikeshed.
-- mattdm

I think one of the things that makes Debian off-putting and unwelcoming is that we're a little *too* obsessed with criticizing everyone's ideas, and what some people see as "healthy discussion" other people see as "hurtful flamewars over bike shed colors."
-- Russ Allbery

I still think we need to specify that we don't discriminate on grounds of preferred bikeshed colour.
-- Ben Hutchings

We seem to be drifting into dangerous territory here. Should we not make explicit the fact that we are willing to discuss the colour of all sheds, even those used for the storage of pots?
-- Philip Hands

Comments (none posted)

Debian joins the Open Source Initiative

The Debian project has announced that it is joining the Open Source Initiative as an affiliate. "By becoming an affiliate of the OSI, the Debian Project recognises the OSI's history of efforts towards goals shared by both organisations. However, the Debian Project will not automatically adopt OSI decisions on the acceptability of particular software licenses and will maintain an independent license review process."

Comments (2 posted)

Gentoo Linux releases 12.1 LiveDVD

Gentoo Linux has announced the release of the Gentoo 12.1 LiveDVD. "The LiveDVD is available in two flavors: a hybrid x86/x86_64 version, and an x86_64 multi lib version. The livedvd-x86-amd64-32ul-12.1 version will work on 32-bit x86 or 64-bit x86_64. If your CPU architecture is x86, then boot with the default gentoo kernel. If your arch is amd64, boot with the gentoo64 kernel. This means you can boot a 64-bit kernel and install a customized 64-bit user land while using the provided 32-bit user land. The livedvd-amd64-multilib-12.1 version is for x86_64 only."

Comments (4 posted)

Open Build Service Brings Website Integration

openSUSE's Open Build Service (OBS) is a system to collaboratively build and easily distribute packages for a wide variety of operating systems and platforms. OBS now has the ability to integrate the intelligent OBS 'download package' page into websites. "This is useful for projects who want to offer their users easy access to downloads for a wide variety of Linux (and non-linux) systems. Moreover, the Open Build Service 2.3 Release Candidate is out and the final release is near."

Full Story (comments: none)

OmniTI Debuts OmniOS

OmniTI has announced OmniOS, a continuation of OpenSolaris, using the Illumos base. "OmniOS provides users with a traditional, Solaris-like installable operating system with a minimal package set to ease regulatory compliance. It delivers a self-hosting, environment with simplified processes for ongoing maintenance. Most importantly, it brings third-party software components up-to-date within OmniOS. Third-party software has been a problem with previous attempts to evolve OpenSolaris, as some have not been updated in a decade. It served as a key driver behind OmniTI's interest to develop OmniOS."

Full Story (comments: none)

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Beta 2

The second and final beta release of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Long Term Support) is available for testing. Variants Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu, Mythbuntu and Ubuntu Studio have also released a second beta. The final version of 12.04 LTS is expected to be released April 26.

Full Story (comments: none)

Distribution News

Debian GNU/Linux

Bits from the 5th Debian Groupware Meeting

The Debian Groupware team recently met in Germany. Click below for a short summary of the meeting.

Full Story (comments: none)

Ubuntu family

Ubuntu Studio 12.04 LTS

The Ubuntu Technical Board has approved Ubuntu Studio 12.04 (a variant aimed at multimedia creation) for three years of long term support.

Full Story (comments: none)

Newsletters and articles of interest

Distribution newsletters

Comments (none posted)

Free is too expensive (Economist)

The Economist complains about the state of desktop Linux. "That said, even the latest KDE distributions are proving just as annoying to set up as Gnome versions. Your correspondent blames the rapid upgrade cycle for leaving too many features with rough edges, too many wonky drivers and utilities, and too many unchecked regressions (bugs caused by changes) in the kernel. All that Linux developers seem to want to do these days is add cool new features, rather than squish existing bugs and make the software more usable." The article is a little muddled, complaining about the "we know best" attitude while saying that Linux lacks the integration seen in iOS or Android, but it's worth a look.

Comments (333 posted)

Linux Mint vs. Ubuntu: the Best Option? (Datamation)

Matt Hartley compares Ubuntu to Linux Mint in a three page article on Datamation. "Despite the mutual goal of offering an easy to use Linux desktop, I've noticed that Ubuntu and Linux Mint have different approaches as to how they appeal to their users. In recent years, I've actually found the two distributions shift further apart than ever before. This change isn't a negative thing, rather a positive highlight that allows both distributions to differentiate themselves better. The shift began with different approaches to tools and software. Later, the differences between the distros evolved to include the desktops as well."

Comments (none posted)

Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page: Development>>


Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds