Which gcc badly needs.
Posted Mar 23, 2012 13:27 UTC (Fri) by jzbiciak (guest, #5246) [Link]
For some of GCC's ugliness, more of the improvement may come from the "rewrite" part than the "in C++" part. The "in C++" part just encourages a more thorough refactoring and rethinking of the problem, than a superficial tweaking-for-less-ugly.
In any case, nothing will fix GNU's ugly indenting standards as long as the language has a C/C++ style syntax. ;-)
Copyright © 2022, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds