User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Distributions looking at LLVM

Distributions looking at LLVM

Posted Mar 22, 2012 21:47 UTC (Thu) by NAR (subscriber, #1313)
In reply to: Distributions looking at LLVM by jhhaller
Parent article: Distributions looking at LLVM

What was the invalid value? 4.999999 instead of 5.0?


(Log in to post comments)

Distributions looking at LLVM

Posted Mar 22, 2012 21:53 UTC (Thu) by jhhaller (subscriber, #56103) [Link]

No, it was one less than it should have been, like it waited to do the ++ part of d++ until after the loop iteration rather than before, or used the wrong register inside the loop. ++d worked fine.

Distributions looking at LLVM

Posted Mar 23, 2012 14:48 UTC (Fri) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988) [Link]

Looks like a corner case triggered by code no one would ever write. Did you file a bug report? I would also point out that GCC has tons of bugs like this fixed in every minor release, so it's nothing special (yet).


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds