|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Power User definition

Power User definition

Posted Feb 13, 2012 19:03 UTC (Mon) by cmorgan (guest, #71980)
In reply to: Power User definition by drag
Parent article: Day: A New Approach to GNOME Application Design

+1

People have several alternatives. They can use another version of the distribution, another distribution or another OS. They can get involved and help shape the future. Complaining is a LOT easier though.


to post comments

Power User definition

Posted Feb 13, 2012 21:44 UTC (Mon) by elanthis (guest, #6227) [Link] (4 responses)

Most people have significantly better things to do than switch the OS every six months because some hobbyist UX designer decided to swap things around for no real reason.

I know the FOSS community has trouble understanding this, but most people do not use a computer just to use a computer; they are not computer geeks. They don't think that installing 20 different alternatives to try them all out is fun. They don't think that seeing new technology is fun. They don't think that shell scripting to work around a GUI flaw is fun. All of these things take time, and that time could be "better" spent doing something that most people do find fun. That may be some other computer-related task (socializing online, playing a game, etc.) or something completely unrelated to computers (going to the bar, hanging out with friends or family, hitting the beach, playing a sport, reading a book, etc.).

So this is the problem. Either (a) you admit that the Linux desktops like GNOME are by geeks for geeks and nobody else and quit eschewing the geeky power users by saying you're aiming for more casual users, or (b) you realize that non-geeks aren't like geeks and stop the endless churn and massive redesigns and instead focus on polishing the little details of the things that already worked just fine and your supposed 10's of millions of users are already comfortable and happy with.

As it is in GNOME land, both groups of users are frequently getting knocked over. I have absolutely zero doubt that the GNOME designers and developers like what they're making (or they wouldn't be making it), but making what you like and what other people like are often different tasks. As a game dev, for instance, I still think MUDs are the pinnacle of online interactions, but you don't see me trying to convince people that GemStone IV is going to take over World of Warcraft by just replacing the text commands with touchscreen gestures, do you. It would be silly to believe something like that.

Power User definition

Posted Feb 13, 2012 23:53 UTC (Mon) by ovitters (guest, #27950) [Link] (3 responses)

You could say the same about most of the Microsoft Office versions. Loads of change between versions.

Power User definition

Posted Feb 14, 2012 0:17 UTC (Tue) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] (2 responses)

Really? Do they completely redo the entire UI with no ability to go back to the previous interface? Do they routinely jettison unpopular features? Do they break existing settings and workflow?

Business users would never put up with having to re-learn Word's interface all the time.

Yes, there are loads of changes. But they're done with a keen eye toward keeping existing users comfortable. I agree, it's a great example.

Power User definition

Posted Feb 14, 2012 0:19 UTC (Tue) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link] (1 responses)

look at the ribbon menu approach that microsoft changed to, and look at the number of people who complain about it (at least they give you the option to switch back, at least for now)

Power User definition

Posted Feb 14, 2012 0:26 UTC (Tue) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link]

> at least they give you the option to switch back, at least for now

This is the critical difference. As far as I can tell, Microsoft spends a lot of time ensuring existing users have an easy path forward.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds