|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A single historical context of volatile

A single historical context of volatile

Posted Feb 10, 2012 22:22 UTC (Fri) by dfsmith (guest, #20302)
Parent article: Betrayed by a bitfield

To quote from Harbison & Steele 3rd ed. (1991)* section 4.4.5

"... any object ... of a volatile-qualified type should not participate in optimizations that would ... modif[y] the object."

To my mind that prohibition includes non-volatile object optimizations that would clobber volatile objects.

The book then slightly contradicts itself two paragraphs later by saying that "optimizations between sequence points are permitted" before clarifying with a hardware example.

* A standard ANSI C reference manual for programmers and compiler implementers at the time.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds