User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Betrayed by a bitfield

Betrayed by a bitfield

Posted Feb 7, 2012 23:29 UTC (Tue) by daglwn (guest, #65432)
In reply to: Betrayed by a bitfield by khim
Parent article: Betrayed by a bitfield

Ah, I read "C11."

Yes, you are correct, but I don't think there's an ABI issue. An ABI issue is much harder to deal with than a semantic change.

With an ABI issue you've got to recompile the world (your project, libraries it links to, etc.) to get a working application. With a semantic change you only recompile the bits that had to recoded to account for the change.


(Log in to post comments)

Betrayed by a bitfield

Posted Feb 8, 2012 8:54 UTC (Wed) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link]

YMMV, as usual.

We recompile the world anyway, so ABI change is less of a problem, but the fact that just a recompilation does not fix the issue and you need to do a lot of investigations is a problem.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds