User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Betrayed by a bitfield

Betrayed by a bitfield

Posted Feb 4, 2012 13:17 UTC (Sat) by paulj (subscriber, #341)
In reply to: Betrayed by a bitfield by dlang
Parent article: Betrayed by a bitfield

There's a comment on the GCC bug that suggests that for volatile to have this affect on a structure member, it would require the whole structure to be tagged volatile - not just the member concerned. (Not offering my own opinion here either way, EINSUFFICIENTEXPERTISE, just drawing attention to the comment).


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds