So the real problem is FUD? [LWN.net]

So the real problem is FUD?

Posted Feb 2, 2012 1:40 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
In reply to: So the real problem is FUD? by dlang
Parent article: A tempest in a toybox

I don't see any notion of repeat offenders in

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html

to post comments

So the real problem is FUD?

Posted Feb 2, 2012 1:44 UTC (Thu) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359) [Link] (1 responses)

Third paragraph of section 8.

Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after your receipt of the notice.

Only applies "first time" for each copyright holder.

So the real problem is FUD?

Posted Feb 2, 2012 10:14 UTC (Thu) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link]

Note that this clause is triggered only if copyright holder notifies you. If someone else finds out you are using GPLv3 product incorrectly (something like casual "I see you are offering special version of GCC in your SDK, but I don't see neither source nor a way to request said sources") and you react accordingly ("Oh, you know, we just forgot to upload them, can you wait a few days?") then license is reinstated without any strings attached. You can make mistakes as many times as you want till the actual copyright notifies you of the violation by some reasonable means.