|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Sealed

Sealed

Posted Feb 1, 2012 22:11 UTC (Wed) by jiu (guest, #57673)
In reply to: Sealed by BrucePerens
Parent article: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement

And why does SFC not insist on publishing the terms of these settlements? It would make things more straightforward.

to post comments

Sealed

Posted Feb 2, 2012 1:31 UTC (Thu) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]

Because it's sealed. They're not allowed to. I would guess that it's Best Buy's request, but only the SFC knows for certain, and they probably can't say.

Sealed

Posted Feb 2, 2012 5:16 UTC (Thu) by BrucePerens (guest, #2510) [Link]

Bradley wrote today about what the terms are, in this blog posting. It is unfortunate that most defendants are more willing to settle if the terms are sealed. But you can look at the IRS filings which Bradley linked to from his blog posting, and find out what money there was, and where it went.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds