|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Clarification on a few points

Clarification on a few points

Posted Jan 31, 2012 23:32 UTC (Tue) by RiotingPacifist (guest, #68160)
In reply to: Clarification on a few points by dlang
Parent article: Garrett: The ongoing fight against GPL enforcement

If you took the "hybrid" out while you were changing parts over then the "hybrid" would certainly be a derivative of the Model T and the Kit-only car a derivative work of the "hybrid".

If you built your kit car while looking at the Model T and never depend on it for either structural integrity or functionality then it would be more complicated. And obviously if you went further still and only took the spec of the Model T and reimplemented it from that then it would be "inspired" and count as clean room reverse engineering.

The real problem is that this isn't a car and the term "derivative work" has real legal meaning and precedent in the world of copyright.

I'm not saying Bruce would have any claim on Toybox purely because Langley has seen Busybox, but I would be careful.


to post comments

Translations share no lines, but original author has copyright

Posted Feb 1, 2012 11:37 UTC (Wed) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link]

If I translate a book from Dutch to English, my work won't contain any lines of the original work, but the author of the Dutch version will still have copyright.

Whether broad copyright is good or bad for us is another debate, but we have to acknowledge that it is today broader than just exact words.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds