User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The case for the /usr merge

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 30, 2012 20:30 UTC (Mon) by dlang (subscriber, #313)
In reply to: The case for the /usr merge by raven667
Parent article: The case for the /usr merge

consolidating 20:1 on servers is fantastic, my company is going heavily into vitualization and is only seeing about 3:1 so far (with the target being 6:1)

also, this sort of savings from virtualization assumes that you are running your prior servers lightly loaded. If you have an application that is large enough that you need to run it on multiple machines to start with, virtualization is a net loss (although this net loss is frequently covered by by doing the consolidation at the same time as a server upgrade)

I don't know about your servers, but on the ones I am seeing 8-12 cores with 64-128G of ram takes significantly more power than the 2-core servers with 4-8G of ram that I still have in production. measurements show somewhere between 2x and 3x


(Log in to post comments)

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 30, 2012 21:06 UTC (Mon) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link]

This reminds me of that great TV commercial IBM did several years ago. "They've stolen the servers! They've stolen the servers!"

The Heist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-NpLu2xC38

-Steve


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds