The case for the /usr merge
The case for the /usr merge
Posted Jan 30, 2012 0:11 UTC (Mon) by mezcalero (subscriber, #45103)In reply to: The case for the /usr merge by paulj
Parent article: The case for the /usr merge
This is simply not true. systemd speaks the D-Bus protocol without relying on the D-Bus daemon. One of the nice things about systemd is that is is fully introspectable even if the only processes running are systemd itself and a bash. For example, boot into emergency mode by passing "emergency" on the kernel cmdline, and you'll see that "systemctl" works just fine even though no processes between PID 1 and bash are around.
Don't spread obvious falsehoods, please!
