The case for the /usr merge
The case for the /usr merge
Posted Jan 27, 2012 15:41 UTC (Fri) by deater (subscriber, #11746)Parent article: The case for the /usr merge
Also anyone who has ever used Solaris should shudder at the thought of making the Linux userspace more like theirs, although I have to admit I haven't used Solaris 11 yet.
I ran a large cluster where /usr was mounted read-only by all the compute nodes,
which PXE-booted with a bare-minimal / in initrd (just enough to mount /usr). Worked well most of the time except for shutdown, when the initscripts just couldn't handle the idea that /usr would go away at unmount-all time. I suppose this proposal wouldn't necessarily make things worse, but it will make it harder to populate an initrd with a minimal / setup if no one is even pretending to try to have a version of mount that can live w/o /usr anymore. I guess you'd have to make it out of busybox or something instead of just copying over selected files from /bin, /sbin, and /lib.
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
