User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The case for the /usr merge

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 27, 2012 3:51 UTC (Fri) by sjj (subscriber, #2020)
In reply to: The case for the /usr merge by rickmoen
Parent article: The case for the /usr merge

It was a simple factual correction. No need to get personal.

I just wish that people commenting on this site would try to be a little more thoughtful and not just assert "bullshit" based on their preconceived notions. Yes, I'm old fashioned and often disappointed.


(Log in to post comments)

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 27, 2012 6:32 UTC (Fri) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998) [Link]

No, "You didn't RTFA" is not a simple factual correction.

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 27, 2012 16:04 UTC (Fri) by faassen (guest, #1676) [Link]

True, saying "my understanding of the article is different" or something along those lines would have been more polite, though less succinct.

The case for the /usr merge

Posted Jan 27, 2012 17:24 UTC (Fri) by sjj (subscriber, #2020) [Link]

Point taken. Argument by assertion just pushes my buttons.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds