|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

The "White Label Office" release candidate

The "White Label Office" release candidate

Posted Dec 23, 2011 11:37 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
In reply to: The "White Label Office" release candidate by mjw
Parent article: The "White Label Office" release candidate

I very well understand IBM may not be pig headed about Apache Openoffice and might jump ship, cut their losses and figure out how to work with the winning project. IBM's response when Red Hat's LVM2 won over their choice of EVMS was classy

https://lwn.net/Articles/14816/

However they are currently pushing hard for Apache Openoffice and I would say there are the primary if not the only reason it even happened and hence not a factor that should be ignored at this point.

to post comments

EVMS tools

Posted Jan 1, 2012 10:59 UTC (Sun) by gvy (guest, #11981) [Link]

> IBM's response [...EVMS...] was classy
Hm, and I haven't heard of EVMS UI tools running on top of LVM ever since (mind you, I used EVMS since 2003 or so and I'm *still* actually using libevms wrapped for guile as a part of ALT Linux installer -- worked on by Sergey Bolshakov for the most part, btw).

Am I missing something or was it so much for the spoken intent?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds