User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Pull requests with signed tags

Pull requests with signed tags

Posted Dec 23, 2011 5:17 UTC (Fri) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)
In reply to: Pull requests with signed tags by cesarb
Parent article: Pull requests with signed tags

Probably no accident. As I recall, Monotone was the existing FOSS distributed version control system that was closest to what Linus was looking for, post-BK. Only reason they didn't go with it was performance. Featurewise, it was what they wanted.

So, if they implement Monotoneish features in Git, it only makes sense.


(Log in to post comments)

Pull requests with signed tags

Posted Dec 25, 2011 19:05 UTC (Sun) by jnareb (subscriber, #46500) [Link]

Probably no accident. As I recall, Monotone was the existing FOSS distributed version control system that was closest to what Linus was looking for, post-BK. Only reason they didn't go with it was performance. Featurewise, it was what they wanted.

So, if they implement Monotoneish features in Git, it only makes sense.

From what I remember the performace thing was a temporary setback (a regression), which unfortunately hit at the time Linus was examining existing OSS DVCS for Linux kernel after BitKeeper fiasco...

...but from what I remember (check GitHistory page on Git Wiki - it is up, but not yet 100% working correctly) that Linus didn't like Monotone signing of all commits; that is why in Git only tags, and now merges / merge sides are signed.


P.S. When IPsec was asking on git mailing list if it would be possible to sign every commit, they were pointed to Monotone instead ;-)


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds