That's why we have a reviewers :-)

Posted Dec 21, 2011 16:58 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: That's why we have a reviewers :-) by topher
Parent article: That newfangled Journal thing

If Lennart wants to come up with a new syslog replacement, doing better than basic syslog isn't good enough.

It is if you can force people using systemd to use it.

(This just provides a reason not to try out systemd: do I really want an increasingly large chunk of the system sucked into it, as now seems likely, disrupting my existing procedures? It's taking over from cron, and now syslogd... thanks but no thanks.)