|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thank you...

Thank you...

Posted Dec 7, 2011 5:36 UTC (Wed) by Klavs (guest, #10563)
In reply to: Thank you... by faramir
Parent article: That newfangled Journal thing

I will bet that a program, starting with logging everything with free form text to the same ID would, if used by sysadmins, quickly be improved upon, in regards to id logging. As a sysadmin I often have to look through source code to find the real reason for an error message (that's one big reason I prefer Open Source) - and if the program already used something with support for proper logging, like journald idea - I would easily whip up a patch for upstream to improve logging for the instance - helping myself in the future as well.


to post comments

Thank you...

Posted Dec 7, 2011 10:35 UTC (Wed) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link]

what is it about the journal 'proper logging' that makes it any easier for you to write a patch to fix bad logging than with normal syslog?

normal syslog can deal with structured logging already via RFC 5324 structured logging, and the CEE specs standardize this further http://cee.mitre.org/

why are these not as good as the journal proposal?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds