|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Worst. SEO. Ever.

Worst. SEO. Ever.

Posted Nov 21, 2011 20:05 UTC (Mon) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
Parent article: That newfangled Journal thing

I'm not going to burn my Lennart Poettering fanboy card or start running Get Off My Lawn Linux (featuring fvwm and dmix!), but won't somebody think of the web searchers of the future? "Linux Journal" and discussions of filesystem journals have massive Google juice by now, so unless this thing gets a less common name it might be invisible.

Lennartlog?


to post comments

Worst. SEO. Ever.

Posted Nov 24, 2011 11:30 UTC (Thu) by dag- (guest, #30207) [Link] (1 responses)

Haha :-)

Pulselog ?

Worst. SEO. Ever.

Posted Nov 25, 2011 4:58 UTC (Fri) by cas (guest, #52554) [Link]

great big steaming log ?

Right on

Posted Nov 25, 2011 16:45 UTC (Fri) by man_ls (guest, #15091) [Link]

Finally, a sensible comment! You put the finger on the worst problem of "The Journal", as if the article "The" was going to save it. Guess in what position of the 105 million current Google hits does Poettering's proposal appear? Not in the first three pages for me. Journald has only 10 million but the results are quite eclectic, not a good choice either. "Linux Journal" has only 1 million but meaning something else.

I am not making suggestions to avoid NIH syndrome triggering, but please, please come up with something else.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds