|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Preferred form

Preferred form

Posted Aug 5, 2011 0:10 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (guest, #1954)
In reply to: Preferred form by jmorris42
Parent article: Emacs and the GPL

My impression from the story is that the BISON source is in fact the preferred form for making most changes to this code, and the original author's method for making changes was to change the BISON source, compile it to elisp, then hand-edit the elisp.

If not, I doubt he would have bothered to respond to the complaint by distributing the BISON source and a program that automates the hand-edits.

I think people understand the idea that sometimes source code was originally generated from some other input file, but is nonetheless the source code -- the preferred form for making changes -- after that.

We haven't seen much controversy over preferred form, but I assume if there ever is any, the methods that the alleged copyright infringer uses himself to modify the code would figure strongly into deciding the issue.


to post comments

Preferred form

Posted Aug 13, 2011 13:19 UTC (Sat) by JanC_ (guest, #34940) [Link]

"Project templates" such as many IDEs or the tools that come with e.g. Django & Quickly provide are another well-known example of where the generated code and not the input file is the preferred form.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds