User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

3.0 and RCU: what went wrong

3.0 and RCU: what went wrong

Posted Aug 4, 2011 22:38 UTC (Thu) by dfsmith (guest, #20302)
Parent article: 3.0 and RCU: what went wrong

How about a patch to rename in_irq() to in_irq_likely()?


(Log in to post comments)

Renaming in_irq()

Posted Aug 13, 2011 23:02 UTC (Sat) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624) [Link]

As I understand it, the problem with renaming it is that it is perfectly reliable for its intended driver-writing users.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds