|From:||Camilo Mesias <camilo-AT-mesias.co.uk>|
|To:||Development discussions related to Fedora <devel-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org>|
|Subject:||Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora|
|Date:||Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:57:54 -0400|
I'm curious to know the use case(s) for this technology. Does it enable certain types of behaviour that aren't possible currently? Would it enable a system running Fedora to interact with other systems with a greater guarantee about its behaviour or function? Is it just something that system integrators would see as a feature enabling them to make a secured system (ie something useful for RHEL)? If it just allows you to optionally run a signed kernel, I don't understand the point if it can be circumvented by choosing to run an unsigned one. So I think there must be some benefit that isn't obvious. What's the benefit? -Cam -- devel mailing list email@example.com https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Copyright © 2011, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds