2.(year-2000).x
2.(year-2000).x
Posted May 25, 2011 19:01 UTC (Wed) by przemoc (guest, #67594)In reply to: 2.(year-2000).x by kragil
Parent article: 2.8.0?
Why it should? Linus head is Linus' and his family's worry. I don't have right to inject nor eject anything from there. I may only stick some ideas via discussion, but that's all.
Maybe read again my comment, where I clearly wrote that "[my version numbering proposal] does not address particularly Linus' concern".