Universal end-to-end nightmare
Universal end-to-end nightmare
Posted May 19, 2011 18:39 UTC (Thu) by oelewapperke (guest, #74309)In reply to: No Metrics by raven667
Parent article: Scale Fail (part 1)
This sadly is a good reason *not* to implement ipv6. Security is a problem, and NAT means universal firewalling.
Given how many security problems we have, and how quickly they get fixed ... this is sadly a good thing.