User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Behind the Puppet license change

Behind the Puppet license change

Posted May 13, 2011 16:55 UTC (Fri) by pboddie (guest, #50784)
In reply to: Behind the Puppet license change by bronson
Parent article: Behind the Puppet license change

I think we can all read the original comment to gain the full context without having to type it out (or copy and paste it) ourselves. That said, I don't see why the ability to deploy software on restrictive, proprietary platforms is dependent on the demise of the GNU project.


(Log in to post comments)

Behind the Puppet license change

Posted May 15, 2011 19:45 UTC (Sun) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link]

I don't see why the ability to deploy software on restrictive, proprietary platforms is dependent on the demise of the GNU project.

I follow elanthis's point. I also follow yours, and agree with the way you quoted in order to make it.

Elanthis isn't saying he's faced with a choice between releasing non-GPL software and having the GNU project continue. He's using a syllogism to show how little he cares about free software.

The syllogism takes the form, "Coke costs more than Pepsi. I would rather buy Coke than drink water. Therefore, I would rather buy Pepsi than drink water.

Releasing non-GPL software hurts the Free Software cause. The GNU project dying in a flood hurts it way more. Elanthis says he would hypothetically accept the demise of the GNU project if necessary to reach his market, therefore he would release non-GPL software if necessary to reach his market.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds