|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thanks for the explanation

Thanks for the explanation

Posted Apr 21, 2011 13:23 UTC (Thu) by Seegras (guest, #20463)
In reply to: Thanks for the explanation by rahulsundaram
Parent article: Introducing /run

"As such in a simplified view libexecdir contents are more like bindir contents only that they don't appear in the user's path."

That is not a case for libexec. That is a case for NOT having any libexec whatsoever.

to post comments

Thanks for the explanation

Posted Apr 21, 2011 13:40 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]

You asked for a rationale and one has been provided. If you disagree, provide a alternative solution instead of naysaying. This is where FHS as a maintained standard would be useful. Unfortunately this isn't the case now.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds