Introducing /run

Posted Mar 30, 2011 16:26 UTC (Wed) by rleigh (guest, #14622)
In reply to: Introducing /run by mezcalero
Parent article: Introducing /run

From my discussions with the mount maintainer, this is only completely solved if you're using systemd. For others, it's still broken in some cases, such as read-only bind mounts and NFS mounts:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux...
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-...

Until Debian adopts systemd exclusively, we are still going to need the above issues fixing before making mtab a symlink. While I would like to see systemd adopted in Debian, I think support for non-Linux kernels is a potential blocker here, mainly for kfreebsd, and Hurd to a lesser extent, if we are to have a unified init across all supported kernels. Not that any of that is my call, just a consideration to bear in mind. It is also likely that Debian will allow other inits such as upstart, which will also require util-linux-ng and related tools to support the above as well.

Regards,
Roger

to post comments

Introducing /run

Posted Mar 30, 2011 18:49 UTC (Wed) by cmorgan (guest, #71980) [Link] (1 responses)

Support for other non-linux platforms is nice but many of these other non-linux platforms aren't the fastest moving or end up rejecting things done in linux because they aren't done The Right Way(tm).

Introducing /run

Posted Mar 31, 2011 14:21 UTC (Thu) by nye (subscriber, #51576) [Link]

>Support for other non-linux platforms is nice but many of these other non-linux platforms aren't the fastest moving or end up rejecting things done in linux because they aren't done The Right Way(tm).

Note that the GP did not say 'platforms', but 'kernels', which is an important distinction in this context.