The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
Posted Mar 17, 2011 4:57 UTC (Thu) by nevets (subscriber, #11875)In reply to: The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience by jmalcolm
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
They can be easily configured so that you can hardly tell the difference and again they are using many of the same libraries and many of the same freedesktop.org standards. Certainly GTK+ unites them all.
That's the kicker: easily configured which seems to be the thing that gnome wants to avoid. It tries very hard to be no way in hell do I want users to do anything different than what I tell them to. I spent a full day trying to get rid of metacity and replace it with sawfish (later to switch it to xfwm4). I just didn't want to waste time learning xfce totally, so I kept gnome and used a different window manager.
I don't know why gnome makes it so hard to change things. To me, it seems the gnome developers are lazy, and do not want to be bothered by supporting such options.
