The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
Posted Mar 16, 2011 22:49 UTC (Wed) by jmalcolm (subscriber, #8876)In reply to: The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience by shemminger
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience
GNOME 3 has a "fallback mode" that allows you to maintain essentially the same desktop you have now as a GNOME 2 user. They are explicitly allowing you to opt out of their great user experience experiment.
Also there are an increasing number of "in camp" alternatives. Unity is a different user experience but it is still going to be GNOME 3 really. All the libraries and all the applications will be the same. The Elementary folks are releasing their own desktop soon (this month?) as well. Their "panel and dock" metaphor may be less jarring than GNOME Shell for some. Again, they will really just be a GNOME 3 desktop though.
Even some of the "other" Desktop Environments are pretty GNOMEish. How different are XFCE or LXDE really? They can be easily configured so that you can hardly tell the difference and again they are using many of the same libraries and many of the same freedesktop.org standards. Certainly GTK+ unites them all.
It just seems an exaggeration to imply that users are being pushed off to Windows, Haiku, or even KDE. You can skip the GNOME Shell and still be using all the same libraries and running all the same apps. This is not at all like KDE4 was.
So, just keep using "fallback mode" if you like GNOME 2. Either GNOME Shell will improve to the point where "fallback mode" loses it's attraction or GNOME Shell will wither on the vine. Free Software tends to be a bit Darwinian.
If "fallback mode" is not enough, I do not see why you are not switching to something else already. I mean, you cannot like GNOME too much if "fallback" is so unattractive.
