The future of vendor-sec
The future of vendor-sec
Posted Mar 11, 2011 4:24 UTC (Fri) by BenHutchings (subscriber, #37955)Parent article: The future of vendor-sec
My position: I really hate secrecy around security issues. When I'm backporting a patch for a public issue, I often look up the CVE on cve.mitre.org and find that there is still no information there, because it was embargoed previously. If I'm dealing with an embargoed issue, I have to avoid commiting any fixes to a public VCS. And if the date is pushed out for the convenience of one distributor or another, the information is quite likely to leak to the blackhats via one route or another (even if they haven't owned the list server). Not to mention government agencies that play on both sides of the security game.
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.
