I can understand the developers complaint and I can understand the community anger at the change. But I won't ever understand someone trying to redefine the GPL to imply that whatever work flow they prefer to use is the only valid form of compliance. RMS defined numerous times what that clause means, that is the definition that applies unless you want to write your own license.
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds