Red Hat's "obfuscated" kernel source [LWN.net]

Red Hat's "obfuscated" kernel source

Posted Feb 28, 2011 18:17 UTC (Mon) by smoogen (subscriber, #97)
In reply to: Red Hat's "obfuscated" kernel source by daney
Parent article: Red Hat's "obfuscated" kernel source

I really can't see how sending a tar ball versus a tar ball and 2000 patches is meant to do anything for CentOS beyond making their life easier. CentOS does not have kernel developers or people who are going to disect which patch did what. They have people who do a mock rebuild of a package and put it in a tree. Having just one source ball to deal with cuts down their complexity quite a bit.

to post comments

Red Hat's "obfuscated" kernel source

Posted Feb 28, 2011 19:08 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

How does one huge tarball make it any easier to rebuild with mock? If they are simply doing just `mock kernel.src.rpm` it makes no difference if it is a huge tarball or 2000 patches. If they do go to try to understand the differences, the huge tarball makes it harder.

This has the makings of a short term mistake on Red Hat, Inc.'s part which is going to continually bite them for the next decade (think: old gcc patch, that *still* gets brought up)....