A netlink-based user-space crypto API
User-space access to the kernel cryptography subsystem has reared its head several times of late. We looked at one proposal back in August that had a /dev/crypto interface patterned after similar functionality in OpenBSD. There is another related effort, known as the NCR API, and crypto API maintainer Herbert Xu has recently posted an RFC for yet another. But giving user space the ability to request that the kernel perform its computation-intensive crypto operations is not uncontroversial.
As noted back in August, some kernel hackers are skeptical that there would be any performance gains by moving user-space crypto into the kernel. But there are a number of systems, especially embedded systems, with dedicated cryptographic hardware. Allowing user space to access that hardware will likely result in performance gains, in fact 50-100x performance improvements have been reported.
Another problem with both the /dev/crypto and NCR APIs (collectively known as the cryptodev-linux modules) is the addition of an enormous amount of code to the kernel to support crypto algorithms beyond those that are already available. Those two modules have adapted user-space libraries for crypto and multi-precision integers and included them into the kernel. They are necessary to support some government crypto standards and certifications that require a separation between user space and crypto processing. So, the cryptodev-linux modules are trying to solve two separate (or potentially separate) problems: user-space access to crypto hardware acceleration and security standards compliance.
When Xu first put out an RFC on his idea for the API (without any accompanying code) back in September, Christoph Hellwig had a rather strongly worded reaction:
Xu more or less agrees with Hellwig, but sees his API as a way to provide access to the hardware crypto devices. Because Xu's API is based on netlink sockets (as opposed to ioctl()-based or a brand new API that the cryptodev-linux modules introduce), he is clearly hoping that it will provide a way forward without requiring such large changes to the kernel:
The purpose of the user-space API is to export the hardware crypto devices to user-space. This means PCI devices mostly, as things like aesni-intel [Intel AES instructions] can already be used without kernel help.
Now as a side-effect if this means that we can shut the security people up about adding another interface then all the better. But I will certainly not go out of the way to add more crap to the kernel for that purpose.
The netlink-based interface uses a new AF_ALG address family that gets passed to the initial socket() call. There is also a new struct sockaddr_alg that contains information about what type of algorithm (e.g. "hash" or "skcipher") is to be used as well as the specific algorithm name (e.g. "sha1" or "cbc(aes)") that is being requested. That structure is then passed in the bind() call on the socket.
For things like hashing, where there is little or no additional information needed, an accept() is done on the socket, which yields an operation file descriptor. The data to be hashed is written to that descriptor and, when there is no more data to be hashed, the appropriate number of bytes (20 for sha1) are then read from the descriptor.
It is a bit more complicated for ciphers. Before accepting the connection on the socket, a key needs to be established for a symmetric key cipher. That is done with a setsockopt() call using the new SOL_ALG level and ALG_SET_KEY option name and passing the key data and its length. But there are additional parameters that need to be set up for ciphers, and those are done using sendmsg().
A cipher will need to know which direction it is operating in (i.e. encrypting or decrypting) and may need an initialization vector. Those are specified with the ALG_SET_OP and ALG_SET_IV messages. Once the accept() has been done, those messages are sent to the operational descriptor and the cipher is ready for use. Data can be sent as messages or written to the operational descriptor, and the resulting data can then be read from that descriptor.
There is an additional wrinkle for the "authenticated encryption with associated data" (AEAD) block cipher mode, which can include authentication information (i.e. message authentication code or MAC) into the ciphertext stream. Because of that, AEAD requires two data streams, one containing the data itself and another with the associated authentication data (the MAC). This is handled in Xu's API by doing two accept() calls, the first for the operational descriptor, and the second for the associated data. If the cipher is operating in encryption mode, both descriptors will be written to, while the encrypted data is read from the operational descriptor. For decryption, the ciphertext is written to the operational descriptor, while the plaintext and authentication data are read from the two descriptors.
There hasn't been much discussion, yet, of the actual code posting, but Xu's September posting elicited a number of complaints about performance, most from proponents of the cryptodev-linux modules. But it would seem that there is some real resistance to adding completely new APIs (as NCR does) or to adding a complicated ioctl()-based API (as /dev/crypto does). Now there are three competing solutions available, but it isn't at all clear that any interface to the kernel crypto subsystem will be acceptable to the kernel community at large. We will have to wait to see how it all plays out.
| Index entries for this article | |
|---|---|
| Kernel | Cryptography |