|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

Posted Oct 19, 2010 23:58 UTC (Tue) by jspaleta (subscriber, #50639)
In reply to: Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore by marcH
Parent article: Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

A lot of miscommunication comes down to a too-clever choice in defining of abstract terms for your own purposes, instead of showing restraint and using words with plain meaning as your target audience would use them.

Many such regrettable mismatches between an author's definition and the readership definition can be accounted for when an author is using what would be considered field-specific terminology when attempting to write for a layreadership and causes inadvertent confusion. That is regrettable but certainly understandable.

It's however a completely different situation when an author makes up a definition on the spot that is not actually already in common usage colloquially and justifies it as a common layperson usage of the term. Such forcible re-definition is abhorrent when the goal is clear communication of any fact or opinion. Such activity is prevalent when the end goal is not communication but agenda specific efforts to manipulate readership ( akin to push polling) and is something that can raise an eyebrow or two to people sensitive to manipulative efforts posing as editorial commentary.

-jef


to post comments

Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

Posted Oct 20, 2010 10:18 UTC (Wed) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935) [Link]

> A lot of miscommunication comes down to a too-clever choice in defining of
> abstract terms for your own purposes, instead of showing restraint and
> using words with plain meaning as your target audience would use them.

Exactly, there is a very good word for what Jeff Gould meant, and that is "custom" (or "customized").

Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

Posted Oct 21, 2010 20:11 UTC (Thu) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (1 responses)

Except that it is the software industry (actually, MICROSOFT) who changed the meaning of the word "proprietary". And the Free Software world is desperately clinging to the Microsoft meaning of the word.

It would do everybody a great favour if we could return the word back to it's original meaning (as understood by the rest of the world) - just look at the word! It is derived from the word PROPERTY, and merely by virtue of being copyright, software is PROPERTY. Therefor, it is proprietary. And that includes linux, gcc, PostgreSQL, you name it.

Just because we choose to share it doesn't stop us owning it. Doesn't stop it being property. Doesn't stop it being proprietary.

Cheers,
Wol

Gould: Oracle to Red Hat: It's Not Your Father's Linux Market Anymore

Posted Oct 22, 2010 17:34 UTC (Fri) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167) [Link]

Linguists 101: Etymology is not definition. The fact that the word "proprietary" derives from a Latin word having to do with owners (and not as you've claimed from the English word property which comes via French) does not define the word.

A good rule of thumb is, if you think the meaning of a word is such that it is always redundant (as would be "proprietary" of software in this vague sense) then you probably have the meaning wrong. This follows from Grice's maxims.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds