|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

My advice on implementing stuff in C:

My advice on implementing stuff in C:

Posted Oct 15, 2010 19:40 UTC (Fri) by Ed_L. (guest, #24287)
In reply to: My advice on implementing stuff in C: by chad.netzer
Parent article: Russell: On C Library Implementation

"But its not low level."
To a certain extent its a circular argument. As others have observed, if you want to do system level (low level) programming on *nix, then you will ultimately end up calling libc, which libraries like glibmm admittedly do a wonderful job of wrapping. For the most part. But for that small part they don't, I've yet to find a substitute for just calling libc (or a syscall) directly. And for me that's one of the beautiful things about C++: its not dogmatic, and allows one to write grotty Fortran when nothing else will do.

:-)


to post comments

My advice on implementing stuff in C:

Posted Oct 16, 2010 14:32 UTC (Sat) by Baylink (guest, #755) [Link]

> And for me that's one of the beautiful things about C++: its not dogmatic, and allows one to write grotty Fortran when nothing else will do.

How come that's not one of the Quotes of the Week?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds