|From:||Ted Ts'o <tytso-AT-mit.edu>|
|To:||Krzysztof Halasa <khc-AT-pm.waw.pl>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 10/10] Fs: ext4: namei: fixed file of checkpatch/pl warnings and errors|
|Date:||Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:23:38 -0400|
|Cc:||Tracey Dent <tdent48227-AT-gmail.com>, linux-ext4-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org|
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 08:36:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > BTW I wouldn't trust checkpatch so blindly. Also keep in mind checkpatch > is only a tool and that maintainers have full authority to ignore the > problems (or "problems") it spews. I'm beginning to think we need to have an entry in the kernel newbie's FAQ warning people that the output of various scripts such as checkpatch and get_maintainer are not authoratative, and are hueristics intended to be supplemented by human intelligence. - TEd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Copyright © 2010, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds