|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Should Open Source Communities Avoid Contributor Agreements? (ComputerWorld)

Should Open Source Communities Avoid Contributor Agreements? (ComputerWorld)

Posted Aug 30, 2010 8:39 UTC (Mon) by renox (guest, #23785)
In reply to: Should Open Source Communities Avoid Contributor Agreements? (ComputerWorld) by trasz
Parent article: Should Open Source Communities Avoid Contributor Agreements? (ComputerWorld)

[[ What about mandatory copyright assignment required by Free Software Foundation for certain projects? ]]

Well, GDC, the D compiler which use GCC as a backend, cannot become a part of GCC because even though the D frontend is opensource, its copyright isn't assigned to the FSF.
This nearly killed the project and hinder greatly the distribution of this project in Linux distributions..
I think that the FSF reasons for this mandatory copyright assignment are really specious:
1) as seen by successful lawsuit made by projects which doesn't use mandatory copyright assignment, it's not needed for lawsuits (even though it probably help)
2) if the FSF wants to relicense some code in an incompatible manner, they would loose the functionnality provided, so *what*?
We're talking about a frontend for one language, not something which is a core part of GCC..


to post comments

Should Open Source Communities Avoid Contributor Agreements? (ComputerWorld)

Posted Aug 31, 2010 10:27 UTC (Tue) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]

Various uproar over various FOSS projects in the past few years have nicely illustrated a fundamental truth: If your new version of a program loses functionality that the old version had, then the people who needed / wanted that functionality don't care how awesome the new version is.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds