peer reviews
peer reviews
Posted Aug 1, 2010 21:26 UTC (Sun) by dlang (guest, #313)In reply to: peer reviews by marcH
Parent article: Realtime Linux: academia v. reality
it could be changed to be based on the number of citations of your papers by other papers (which is arguably a better indication of your works worth than simply the number of papers published)
but if you want to count the papers published, that's pretty simple to do, even without the current publishing companies, simply document what you've published.
this doesn't include information about how good the papers are, but I have my doubts about the existing publishers really doing that anyway.
