The ghost of sysfs past
The ghost of sysfs past
Posted Jul 23, 2010 15:21 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (guest, #1954)Parent article: The ghost of sysfs past
In 2010, nobody has shipped a distribution which relies on the old layout for some time.
This is obvious hyperbole, since there are hundreds of Linux distributions. Especially if you count a custom build.
It's a shame that a kernel developer would want to legitimize only major distributions.
It's even a shame a kernel developer would want to say a distribution is the only legitimate user of sysfs. Just last week, I had a program which is not part of a Linux distribution break because of a more recent reorganization of sysfs. The program is supposed to match up a block device special name with a location in a SAS network for maintenance purposes.
Posted Aug 6, 2010 13:17 UTC (Fri)
by gvy (guest, #11981)
[Link]
:)
> This is obvious hyperbole
Maybe rather an announce of Nobody Linux shipping with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED? :)
