|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

The FSF needs pragmatism

The FSF needs pragmatism

Posted Jul 8, 2010 23:37 UTC (Thu) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
In reply to: The FSF needs pragmatism by ccurtis
Parent article: Bilski: business as usual

Why shouldn't the first spreadsheet be patented?

That's actually easy to answer. All it is is a ledger book (the idea dates from the 1800s, if not earlier) done using a computer.

Where the novelty lies is in all the naysayers saying "it can't be done", and the visicalc guy (can't remember his name) pulled it off. HOW he did it might be protectable, but that's subject to protection under copyright, not patent.

At the end of the day, software is maths. The program (as supplied on tape, floppy or CD) is just one big number. And if you combine that with a general purpose computer to make a word-processor, or spreadsheet, or database, the result is not (or shouldn't be!) patentable.

If you've got dedicated hardware (like a crypto-chip, say) then yes, patent the cryptochip. But if someone then makes an emulator that runs on a pc, tough. They've worked round your patent, as the patent system quite clearly says is legit.

Cheers,
Wol


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds