Strange twist of the facts

For me, »*WELL REGULATED* militia« reads different than everybody has the right to shoot at his neighbour when he thinks it's self defense. The SC didn't just confirm the right for well regulated militias, it made the (de-facto existing for most of the country) right for personal posessions of guns for personal goals precedent-level legal.

But then, I live in a civilized country, don't have to take up with barbaric U.S. gun crazyness and don't have to live in one of the U.S. cities where there are multiple shootings every night. (Chicago, any one? When there is a shooting here, it's national news, so seldom does it happen.) So, actually, I don't care.