Strange twist of the facts
Strange twist of the facts
Posted Jun 29, 2010 14:37 UTC (Tue) by davide.del.vento (guest, #59196)In reply to: Strange twist of the facts by clugstj
Parent article: Bilski: business as usual
Well, before the court ruled, there were many who interpreted the amendment II as applied to states ("well regulated militia"), not individuals.
Or at most that "individual rights" were there just for the historic accident of the end slavery happening at the same time, and the right of those people to defends themselves against their "owner".
Or at most that "individual rights" were there just for the historic accident of the end slavery happening at the same time, and the right of those people to defends themselves against their "owner".
So "court just legalized gun possession" could be a little twist but not much, IMHO.