|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Bilski: business as usual

Bilski: business as usual

Posted Jun 29, 2010 2:53 UTC (Tue) by yokem_55 (subscriber, #10498)
In reply to: Bilski: business as usual by mikov
Parent article: Bilski: business as usual

Ironically, to many gun rights groups, the McDonald ruling suffers from the same flaw as the Bilski ruling: it doesn't set a clear standard. While the court took a major step of tossing out the outright ban on handguns in Chicago, the majority did not set any standard on what kinds of restrictions on firearm ownership were alowed or not. Outright bans? No. Anything else? Who knows.


to post comments

Bilski: business as usual

Posted Jun 29, 2010 3:11 UTC (Tue) by drag (guest, #31333) [Link]

I am a supporter of gun rights, but I notice how people leave out the "well regulated" part when talking about it.

Bilski: business as usual

Posted Jun 29, 2010 4:38 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (1 responses)

No matter what else the court is in favour of, it's in favour of more work for lawyers.

(but that goes almost without saying)

Bilski: business as usual

Posted Jun 29, 2010 12:51 UTC (Tue) by proski (guest, #104) [Link]

You nailed it


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds