LSM stacking (again)
Posted Jun 28, 2010 1:54 UTC (Mon) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
Posted Jun 28, 2010 2:16 UTC (Mon) by dlang (subscriber, #313)
If you believe that this is the case you should have no objection to LSM stacking as you will only want to use these major frameworks that have picked things up from the small players anyway.
the rest of us who are interested in multiple small solutions that we can understand will be your beta testers for these small modules before they can get picked up.
if the only way to try something new is to either abandon all protection from anything else, or wait until the idea gets picked up in the big framework (without anyone being able to test it until then) you have very little testing of new things
Posted Jun 28, 2010 4:36 UTC (Mon) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
Posted Jun 29, 2010 12:54 UTC (Tue) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
My perspective is that we're in a "pick one" scenario, with the options being roughly:
Posted Jun 28, 2010 5:47 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
I think I prefer stacking, at least restrictive stacking.
Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds