LSM stacking (again)
LSM stacking (again)
Posted Jun 24, 2010 15:34 UTC (Thu) by MisterIO (guest, #36192)Parent article: LSM stacking (again)
IMO there should be only a limited set of combinations allowed, that is those LSMs whose functionality doesn't overlap at all. That way you wouldn't need any stacking, you could just allow each LSM to work on its own, without any interaction.
