Er...did we overlook the title of the graph? Specifically the "changesets" and "company" parts? ;-)
In the graph the large contribution that cannot be attributed to specific company-sponsored efforts is indeed completely discarded, when compared to the list, where the two categories "None" and "Unknown" are at the top of the list (I mentioned lines of code changed).
(Also see the upstream clarification about what "(None)" means.)
I observed that "number three in the list" is not "top of the list", especially since the article recognizes the "None" contribution as "significant".
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds