Kernel development
Brief items
Kernel release status
The current development kernel is 2.6.32-rc5, released by Linus on October 15. "90% of the bulk of the changes since -rc4 are in drivers, with most of it coming from two new network drivers (stmmac and vmxnet3). But apart from the new drivers, there's almost 300 commits in there, and most of them are pretty spread our random one- (or few-) liners: arch updates (arm, powerpc, x86), some filesystem updates (mainly btrfs), and some documentation, networking etc." The short-form changelog is in the announcement, or see the full changelog for the details.
Due to the distraction of the kernel summit, no changes have been merged into the mainline repository since the 2.6.32-rc5 release.
There have been no stable updates over the last week. The 2.6.31.5 update is in the review process as of this writing; it may be available by the time you read this.
Quotes of the week
Answer: yes: up to a 70% increase in performance, committed the next day. But the kernel devs weren't done yet: a quick grep of Linux kernel mails over the next weeks showed x264 popping up in quite a few scheduler benchmarks: they had added it as a regular test case. And just recently we got another 10% performance.
Results of the 2009 LF TAB election
One of the more obscure events held at the kernel summit every year is an election to fill five of the ten seats on the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board (TAB). The TAB is charged with interfacing between the LF and the development community. The 2009 election, held in Tokyo, chose between a large set of candidates. In the end, the winners were Greg Kroah-Hartman, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Ted Ts'o, and your editor Jonathan Corbet. The other half of the board (whose terms end next year) is James Bottomley, Kristen Carlson Accardi, Chris Wright, Chris Mason, and Dave Jones.
Kernel development news
The 2009 Linux Kernel Summit
The 2009 Linux Kernel Summit was held in Tokyo, Japan on October 19 and 20. Jet-lagged developers from all over the world discussed a wide range of topics. LWN's Jonathan Corbet was there, and has written the following summaries.
Day 1
The sessions held on the first day of the summit were:
- Mini-summit readouts; reports from
various mini-summit meetings which have happened over the last six
months.
- The state of the scheduler, the
kernel subsystem that everybody loves to complain about.
- The end-user panel, wherein
Linux users from the enterprise and embedded sectors talk about how
Linux could serve them better.
- Regressions. Nobody likes them; are
the kernel developers doing better at avoiding and fixing them?
- The future of perf events; a
discussion of where this new subsystem is likely to go next.
- LKML volume and related issues. A
session slot set aside for lightning talks was
really mostly concerned with the linux-kernel mailing list and those
who post there.
- Generic device trees. The device tree abstraction has proved helpful in the creation of generic kernels for embedded hardware. This session talked about what a device tree is and why it's useful.
Day 2
The discussions on the second day were:
- Legal issues; a lawyer visits the
summit to talk about the software patent threat and how to respond to
it.
- How Google uses Linux: the challenges
faced by one of our largest and most secretive users.
- Performance regressions: is the kernel
getting slower? How do we know and where are the problems coming
from?
- Realtime: issues related to the
merging of the realtime preemption tree into the mainline.
- Generic architecture support: making
it easier to port Linux to new processor architectures.
- Development process issues, including linux-next, staging, merge window rules, and more.
The kernel summit closed with a general feeling that the discussions had
gone well. It was also noted that our Japanese hosts had done an
exceptional job in supporting the summit and enabling everything to happen;
it would not be surprising to see developers agitating for the summit to
return to Japan in the near future.
See also: the obligatory kernel
summit group photo.
File holes, races, and mmap()
File operations using truncate() have always had race conditions. Developers have always been concerned with file writes racing against file size modifications. Various corner cases exist where data could either be lost or ignored when an error occurs or unexpected data may occur where zeros are expected for holes in the file. Jan Kara's patch is an attempt to fix such races, and it depends on the new truncate sequence, which corrects the way the inode size of the file is set.
Holes
A hole in a file is an area represented by zeros. It is created when data is written at an offset beyond the current file size, or the file size is "truncated" to something larger than the current file size. The space between the old file size and the offset (or new file size) is filled by zeros. Most filesystems are smart enough to mark the holes in the inode, and not store them physically on disk (these are also known as sparse files). The filesystem marks blocks in the inode to denote that they are part of a hole. When a user requests data from an offset in a hole, the filesystem creates a page filled with zeroes and passes it to user space.
The handling of holes becomes a little tricky when the holes are not aligned to the filesystem block boundary. In that case, parts of blocks must be zeroed to represent the holes. For example, a 12k file on a filesystem with 4k block size with a hole at offset 2500 of size 8192, would require the last 1596 (4096-2500) bytes of the first block to be set to zero and the first 2500 bytes of the third block to be set to zeroes. The second block is bypassed in the inode's list of data blocks and does not occupy any space on disk.
Mmap
mmap() is a system call to map the contents of a file into memory. The call takes the address where the file should be mapped, a file descriptor, the offset within the file to be mapped, and the length of data from the offset to be mapped. Usually, the address passed is NULL, so that the kernel can choose an address and provide it to the process. Mmap can be performed in two ways:
- Private mapping - defined by MAP_PRIVATE, this map is private to the process. Any modifications to the data are not reflected to the file. If the process modifies the data, the page is copied and modifications are performed in the new page. This is popularly known as copy-on-write (COW)
- Shared mapping - defined by MAP_SHARED, this map can be shared among processes, and can be used as an effective tool for Inter-Process Communication (IPC). Any modification performed in the file are written back to the disk, and is available for other processes to read. However, data writes to disk are not guaranteed to be immediate, and are usually performed when the process calls msync() or munmap().
The current sequence in page_mkwrite() can race with file size changes performed by truncate(). File truncates happening while the data is written back from a shared mmap() could lead to unexpected results, such as loss of data or data in places where zeros are expected.
Data loss
Data loss in a program can occur in a specific case where a program maps a file into memory bigger than the current file size. To explain how data loss can occur, consider the following code snippet for writing a file, on a system with a block size of 1024 bytes and a page size of 4096 bytes:
ftruncate(fd, 0);
pwrite(fd, buf, 1024, 0);
map = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
map[0] = 'a'; /* page_mkwrite() for index 0 is called */
Note that even though the file size is set to 1024 bytes, the map is mapped to 4096, which is beyond the current file size. This is feasible because pages from a file are mapped in page size chunks. Since there is a change to the shared memory, this causes the entry in the page table to become writable.
pwrite(fd, buf, 1, 10000);
map[3000] = 'b';
fsync(fd); /* writepage() for index 0 is called */
When the first page_mkwrite() is called, only block 0 is allocated because the file size can fit in 1024 bytes. However, when the program later increases the file size and calls fsync(), the writepage() needs to allocate 3 more blocks to complete the write caused by changing map[3000]. In that situation, if the user's quota exhausts or the filesystem has no more space, the data modified by map[3000] is silently ignored.
Unexpected non-zeroes in a hole
A non-zero character can end up in a hole if the process dies after extending the file, but before zeroing the page and writing it. To understand the problem, consider the following code snippet:
ftruncate(fd, 1000);
map = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
while (1)
map[1020] = 'a';
The program continuously writes at offset 1020. The kernel zeroes the page from offset 1000 to 4096 before writing the page to disk. However, map[1020] can be set after the kernel has zeroed the page. The page is unlocked and set for write-back. In this case, a non-zero character will be written to the disk. This is not a problem because it is out of the range of the file size. However, if another process increases the file size (and thus the size of the hole), and is killed before re-zeroing and writing the page, the "dirty character" will be included in the file the next time the file is read. This problem exists regardless of the block size of the filesystem. The complete program to demonstrate this problem is posted here.
Solution
Jan's patch introduces helper functions which facilitate the creation of holes: block_prepare_hole() and block_finish_hole(). These functions are respectively called in write_begin() and write_end() sequence of address space operations if the current file position is detected to be beyond the current file size, that is, for creation of a hole. write_begin() and write_end() are usually called in page_mkwrite(). The part of the page in the hole is zeroed in block_prepare_hole() instead of block_write_full_page(). The page remains locked during the entire page_mkwrite() sequence, so it is protected against writes from other processes. The truncate operation can only occur once the page lock is released, serializing the sequence. This resolves the problem of the stray data that can land in the hole.
On the other hand, block_finish_hole() is responsible for marking the part of the page in the hole as read-only. If the process attempts to write anything in the part of the hole belonging to the page, page_mkwrite() will be called. The kernel gets an opportunity to allocate buffer_heads, if required, for the additional write, or return an error in the case of ENOSPC or EDQUOT. If there is an error, write_begin() will return it, thus, modifying the mapped memory area, will return an error (SIGSEGV). The function to write data back to disk, block_write_full_page(), checks for all pages' buffers in the page instead of just those within the file size, which are delayed or mapped. The new truncate sequence guarantees that the file is not truncated while this is performed. This resolves the problem of data loss.
The patch introduces a new field new_writepage in struct address_space_operations, to store the new method used to perform the writepage(). Like the new truncate sequence, this field is a temporary hack and will go away once all filesystems adhere to the new standards of writing the pages to disk. Filesystems implementing the new method of writepage must set the new_writepage and handle blocks with holes, by preparing the creation of holes in write_begin(), and to terminate it in write_end(). The old behavior of handling page_mkwrite() is restored in noalloc_page_mkwrite(). It does not allocate any blocks on page fault and marks all the unmapped buffers in the page as delayed so that block_write_full_page() writes them.
simple_create_hole() is a new function analogous to the rest of the simple_* functions; it is a simple way of creating hole in a file. The function zeros out the part of the pages which are a part of the hole. This function is called whenever file size is truncated beyond the current file size.
This posting is the third revision of the patch, and most of the objections have been ironed out in the earlier two passes. Since this patch deals with closing a race condition, it is probable that it will be included eventually. However, this series depends on the new truncate series, so it must wait for those patches to be incorporated in the mainline kernel. Moreover, the hackish method of distinguishing the new writepage must be removed. This requires all filesystems transition to using the new writepage sequence.
[ Thanks to Jan Kara for reviewing the article. ]
Patches and updates
Kernel trees
Architecture-specific
Core kernel code
Development tools
Device drivers
Filesystems and block I/O
Janitorial
Memory management
Networking
Virtualization and containers
Miscellaneous
Page editor: Jonathan Corbet
Next page:
Distributions>>
