|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Really OT: Android or Symbian phone?

Really OT: Android or Symbian phone?

Posted Sep 27, 2009 22:30 UTC (Sun) by debacle (subscriber, #7114)
Parent article: Google shutting down independent Android image developers?

I currently think about buying either a Huawei/T-Mobile Pulse (Android) or a Nokia E52 (Symbian). Comparing the phones, the Pulse seems heavy (>130g vs. <100g) and clumsy (~14mm vs <10mm), it does not feature an FM radio, and the battery time is much lower. OTOH, Android is — while not how I would like to see Linux on phones — "cooler" than Symbian. It seems, there is at least a Python interpreter for Symbian, as well as free sofware to play Ogg Vorbis. But would the Pulse allow me (= technically) to remove software I don't want? (E.g. a Flash player which serves no other purpose to annoy me with ads I don't want to see, but have to pay for in terms of expensive UMTS traffic.) The opposite of CyanogenMods work :~) What is less broken in respect to usability? Android or Symbian? Which is more friendly for fans of free software? After all, both systems are based on free software...


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds